注册 / 登录
This study investigates effects of multimedia on cognitive load, self-efficacy and learners’ ability to solve multiple rule-based problems. Two hundred twentytwo college students were randomly assigned to interactive and noninteractive multimedia groups. Based on Engelkamp’s multimodal theory, the present study investigates the role of multimedia in multiple rule-based problem solving. The findings indicate that providing learners with manipulative function in multimedia would facilitate their problem solving through reduced cognitive load and improved self-efficacy. The study identifies a significant mediator effect for self-efficacy that mediates between multimedia and learners’ problem solving. Discussion focuses on the effects of multimedia and self-efficacy on learners’ performance in multiple rule-based problem solving. Suggestions are made with regard to the design of problem solving in future studies.
At the recent Wiley-Blackwell executive seminar for journal editors, there was much discussion of the relative merits of subscription publishing versus author paid publishing. For those who are not familiar with these two approaches, let me set out a very simplified description.
A pair of papers re-examined the evidence from a national initiative to train all teachers in England to bring them up to the level of newly qualified teachers, who are required to know when to use and when not to use information and communication technologies (ICT) in their professional practice. The first paper confirmed that multilevel evaluation of professional development was robust for ICT teacher training. This second paper contrasts the highest and lowest rated designs for ICT teacher training: an ‘organic’ approach that provided training in schools was highly rated, whereas a centralised computerassisted learning approach with online access to trainers was the lowest rated design. The study supports an ecological view of the diffusion of ICT innovations in education and recommends that ICT teacher training be designed to support evolution of each teacher’s classroom, school and region, as well as the training of the ICT teacher trainers.
Although a number of researchers have examined response pad systems (RPSs) in higher education, there has been very little research at the K-12 level. This paper investigated the impact of using an RPS in the learning of physics concepts in a secondary school in Singapore. Two classes (n = 35 students in each class) of secondary five students participated in this study. One of the classes used an RPS while the other did not. Both classes completed a pretest and a posttest which tested the students in the application of the physics concepts taught. Results suggested that the class that used an RPS performed better in the posttest compared to the class that did not use the system. In addition,we explored the teacher and students’ perceptions of using the RPS.
This paper draws on qualitative data from a study of student use of blended learning as part of a conventionally taught undergraduate Sociology course. Findings from an early evaluation questionnaire highlighted an overwhelming pattern of non-use of the materials and subsequent research with a group of 16 students evidenced limited and inconsistent engagement with the resources. In an analysis of the category ‘non-use’, the students’ rejection of the materials is seen to be closely related to a trust in traditional texts as authentic academic knowledge and an instrumental and strategic approach to study. Blended learning resources are shown to challenge existing learning patterns and practices, reconfigure existing understandings and expectations of academic scholarship and reconstruct academic boundaries in new spaces.
The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of paper-based and computer-based concept mappings on computer hardware achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude of the eight grade secondary school students. The students were randomly allocated to three groups and were given instruction on computer hardware. The teaching methods used for each group were the conventional method, paper-based concept mapping and computerbased concept mapping. At the end of a 4-week instruction, posttests were administered to assess computer hardware achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude of the students. The findings indicate that paper-based and computer-based concept mapping strategies produce better results than the conventional method. However, the effects of paper-based and computerbased concept mapping strategies were not significantly different.
The purpose of the study reported on in this paper was to identify performance criteria and ratings in rubrics designed for the evaluation of learning in online asynchronous discussions (OADs) in post-secondary contexts. We analysed rubrics collected from Internet sources. Using purposive sampling, we reached saturation with the selection of 50 rubrics. Using keyword analysis and subsequent grouping of keywords into categories, we identified 153 performance criteria in 19 categories and 831 ratings in 40 categories. We subsequently identified four core categories as follows: cognitive (44.0%), mechanical (19.0%), procedural/managerial (18.29%) and interactive (17.17%). Another 1.52% of ratings and performance criteria were labelled vague and not assigned to any core category.
The book is an “outgrowth” of a three-day international research conference held in the Netherlands to discuss multimedia-related issues in the context of young children’s learning. The book chapters offer a refreshingly wide range of perspectives with contributions from scholars from the UK, the US, Canada, Norway, Israel,andthe Netherlands.What is significant, however, is, as the editors note, the remarkable convergence of studies with positive findings. These indicate that, when designed in accordance with sound educational principles and constructed to support young children’s cognitive development, multimedia applications can significantly improve literacy development in young learners, whether they are average emerging readers or readerswith special needs. This is the core message of the book.
创建一个新的学习元并添加到当前知识群
从平台上已有的学习元中，选择一个合适的学习元添加到当前知识群
知识群评论 (0条)